DKNetwork Logo DKNetwork Logo
2026 NFL Best Bets: Long Shot MVP Picks

2026 NFL Best Bets: Long Shot MVP Picks

Published:

By: Dan Johnson

The NFL MVP market becomes most interesting after the favorites disappear. The longshots then emerge. These are players whose winning season can still be imagined clearly, even if several pieces must break correctly. The price pays for uncertainty, but the path must remain coherent.

That usually means elite production, double-digit wins, durability, and a season voters can describe in one sentence. The quarterback may need a major efficiency jump, a healthier supporting cast, a rebuilt offensive line, or an unexpected leap from his team. None of those possibilities can exist only in theory. The underlying numbers, coaching structure, and roster must already hint at the breakthrough.

The best longshot bets live between plausibility and discomfort. They should feel dangerous enough to justify the odds, yet grounded enough to survive serious scrutiny. These three candidates each carry a genuine MVP ceiling, a believable team path, and one defining question the market may be pricing too harshly.

2026 NFL MVP: odds and longshots analysis

Jared Goff (+3500)

At +3500, Jared Goff is my favorite longshot because his 2025 season already carried most of an MVP résumé. He completed 68% of his passes for 4,564 yards, 34 touchdowns, and eight interceptions. Only Matthew Stafford threw for more yards. Goff finished second in touchdown passes and posted a 105.5 rating. The deeper numbers held up beautifully: 106.46 passing EPA, 0.14 EPA per play, 47.87% success, and 7.9 yards per attempt.

Goff’s path remains narrow because he contributes almost nothing as a runner. His -14.42 rushing EPA erased some passing value. His 6.80-yard average target depth also revealed Detroit’s dependence upon timing and yards after catch. That same structure remains glorious. Amon-Ra St. Brown caught 117 passes for 1,401 yards and 11 touchdowns. Jahmyr Gibbs rushed for 1,223 yards and 13 scores. Jameson Williams owns consecutive 1,000-yard seasons. Sam LaPorta has returned from the back injury that ended his 2025 campaign.

Detroit also attacked the weakness that buried last season. The line ranked 31st in pass-block win rate and allowed 39 sacks. Penei Sewell has moved to left tackle. Cade Mays arrived at center, while rookie Blake Miller adds another athletic option. Drew Petzing inherits a top-five scoring and yardage offense, rather than a restoration project. Detroit carries a 10.5-win total after finishing 9-8. If protection recovers, 4,700 yards, 40 touchdowns, and 12 wins sit inside Goff’s established range. At 35-to-1, that possibility deserves investment.

C.J. Stroud (+4500)

C.J. Stroud at +4500 is the field’s most attractive rebound wager. His 2025 line produced 3,041 yards, 19 touchdowns, and eight interceptions across 14 games. Those totals never approached MVP volume. His underlying season still represented considerable progress. Stroud’s EPA per play climbed from -0.03 in 2024 to 0.11. His success rate rose from 41.19% to 46.15%. His sack rate collapsed from 8.37% to 4.88%. He again attacked downfield with an 8.49-yard average target depth.

That improvement arrived without the rookie-year electricity that produced 4,108 yards and 8.23 yards per attempt. Stroud threw only five interceptions that season. Houston now gives him a better chance to recover that aggression. The Texans rebuilt their line with Braden Smith, Wyatt Teller, and Keylan Rutledge. David Montgomery joins Woody Marks in the backfield, strengthening their early-down offense. Nico Collins remains the essential vertical piece after producing 1,117 yards at 15.73 yards per reception.

Houston’s defense led the NFL at -0.13 EPA per play last season. The Texans also closed the year with a franchise-record 10-game winning streak. That defense gives Stroud a believable route toward 12 victories and a high AFC seed. It also complicates his candidacy. Comfortable victories can direct praise away from the quarterback. Stroud must turn Houston’s offense from competent support into a weekly force. A healthy season around 4,300 yards and 35 touchdowns would complete that argument. The 9.5-win total appears modest beside this defensive floor. At 45-to-1, the price pays properly for the necessary statistical eruption.

Jaxson Dart (+4500)

Jaxson Dart at +4500 is the volatility play, and his ceiling carries enough violence to justify the risk. He threw for 2,272 yards, 15 touchdowns, and five interceptions as a rookie. Dart added 487 rushing yards and nine scores. Those 24 total touchdowns came despite only 12 starts. He generated 38.12 rushing EPA, nearly matching Josh Allen’s 38.77. Dart finished with 29.83 total EPA, giving New York valuable offense before his passing game fully developed.

The passing case remains unfinished. Dart produced -8.29 passing EPA, 6.7 yards per attempt, a 45.22% success rate, and an 8.47% sack rate. He abandoned pockets early, waited too long for receivers, and completed too few deep shots. New York hired John Harbaugh, then surrounded Dart with Matt Nagy, Brian Callahan, and Greg Roman. That staff carries extensive experience with protection, play action, quarterback movement, and young passers. The offense should give Dart cleaner definitions without sanding away his improvisational aggression.

The Giants reinforced him with equal urgency. They drafted tackle Francis Mauigoa at No. 10 and signed fullback Patrick Ricard. Darnell Mooney, Calvin Austin III, and Isaiah Likely deepen the receiving group. Malik Nabers continues recovering from ACL surgery after sharing only one half with Dart last season. New York’s 7.5-win total explains the enormous price. Dart must improve sharply as a passer and pull the Giants four victories beyond market expectation. That is a severe demand. His rushing production makes the improbable season possible, especially if Nabers returns healthy and the new staff controls Dart’s worst impulses.

I am a promoter at DraftKings and am also an avid fan and user (my username is thegreatdansby9) and may sometimes play on my personal account in the games that I offer advice on. Although I have expressed my personal view on the games and strategies above, they do not necessarily reflect the view(s) of DraftKings and do not constitute a representation that any particular strategy will guarantee success. All customers should use their own skills and judgment in building lineups. I may also deploy different players and strategies than what I recommend above. I am not an employee of DraftKings and do not have access to any non-public information.