DKNetwork Logo DKNetwork Logo
QB Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em Picks: Fantasy Football Quarterbacks to Start or Sit in Week 8

QB Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em Picks: Fantasy Football Quarterbacks to Start or Sit in Week 8

Updated:

By: Dan Johnson

Week 8 is consolidation season—the league settles, and quarterbacks separate by answers, not arm talent. Protection is splintered, pass-rush win rates climb, and defenses spam simulated pressure with post-snap rotation to erase crossers. Fantasy scoring tilts toward two archetypes: clean-pocket surgeons with sub-2.6s time-to-throw and creators with real rushing equity that converts first downs. Usage and leverage beat names now; early-down PROE, first-read rate, and red-zone pass rate decide ceilings more than highlights. Play-action and RPO lift EPA per dropback only when coordinators commit to motion and condensed splits; without it, explosives vanish and third-down YPA craters. The bye crunch tightens streamer options, injuries still thin depth, and coordinators counter with quick-game sequencing, stack releases, and glance-dagger combinations that reward timing. On this slate: Bo Nix draws Dallas in a likely track meet; Jordan Love visits Pittsburgh with Aaron Rodgers across the sideline amid retirement chatter; Joe Flacco faces his former Jets; Jaxson Dart gets another swing at Philadelphia; San Francisco sits Brock Purdy while Baltimore clears Lamar Jackson as a full participant. And with so many elsewhere devastating injuries to marquee quarterbacks—though the group is getting healthier week-by-week, luckily—I’ve got three quarterbacks you should start this week, and two you should sit.

Follow my handle @dansby_edits for more fantasy football advice, as well as plenty of NFL and college football betting goodies.

Start ‘Em

Bo Nix, Denver Broncos (vs. Dallas Cowboys)

Nix’s best bet to points is clean pockets, quick rhythm, and poised verticals. He’s at 1,556 yards, 11 TDs, four INTs with a 2.56s time to throw and a microscopic 2.86% sack rate—proof the ball’s out on schedule. His profile carries an ADOT 7.3, 41.1% success rate, and 0.06 EPA/play, while Denver leans into 30.1% play-action, 4.1 deep attempts per game, and 4.9 red-zone attempts per game—volume with teeth. Dallas is the perfect accelerant: the Cowboys allow 25.5 QB fantasy points per game (most) and rank second-worst in passing and rushing yards allowed to QBs. Expect snaps, too: DEN 28.5 s/play (9th) and DAL 28.8 (11th) keep the game moving.

Sink your teeth into the trenches and leverage splits. Denver owns the No. 1 pass-block win rate (73%), while Dallas’ pass rush sits 21st (37%)—a mismatch that insulates intermediate and deep concepts. Team-level finish matters: the Broncos convert drives with a 68.2% red-zone TD rate (sixth). And when teams throw at Dallas, efficiency spikes: opponents carry an 8.1 YPA and a 110.6 rating on 238 attempts—softness that pairs with Nix’s on-schedule triggers. With both sides playing fast and Dallas hemorrhaging QB production, Nix’s attempts should land in the low-to-mid 30s with layered shots off glance, dagger, and double-moves once the Cowboys sit on slants. Projection: 260–285 yards, 2–3 TDs, plus 15–25 rushing yards—a sturdy top-10 outcome if one deep shot to Mims or Franklin hits.

Jordan Love, Green Bay Packers (at Pittsburgh Steelers)

Love’s skillset is vertical accuracy wrapped in quick-rhythm conviction. He sits at 1,475 yards, 10 TDs, two INTs with a QBR north of 70, and he’s been hot lately—1.5 passing TDs per game over his last four. The deep ball is real: 41% completion on 16+ air yards and league-best deep-ball EPA per attempt. Pittsburgh is the accelerant. They’ve allowed the second-most schedule-adjusted QB fantasy points, opponents throw at 62.3% against them, and they play man at 32.7% (seventh-highest)—exactly the look Love punishes. Against man, he owns a 118.7 passer rating (fifth among starters), feasting on leverage with in-breakers, seams, and boundary nines. The stage helps, too; in a national window, tempo nudges up and isolation routes bite when corners lose help.

Sink your teeth into his situational edges. Inside the 20, Love carries a 104.8 red-zone passer rating with a 9.1% TD rate, and play-action adds +2.3 YPA versus straight dropback—catnip against backers that overstep. On third down he’s converting 46% at 7.8 YPA, synchronized to a 2.55s time to throw that fits Green Bay’s quick-glance verticals. Expect LaFleur to stress the nickel with motion, then layer glance, dagger, and deep-over once safeties start driving. If the Steelers trade empty possessions, the Packers inherit compressed fields and cleaner red-zone looks. The split says throw; the film says throw; the matchup screams it. Projection: 260–285 yards, 2–3 TDs, with top-10 upside if one deep lands and YAC pops. He gets Christian Watson back this week, too. And Romeo Doubs is always a breakout waiting to happen. Good for the goose, good for the whole Love-ing gander, etc.

Joe Flacco, Cincinnati Bengals (at New York Jets)

Flacco’s current bag is late-down poise and veteran sequencing. He owns the No. 1 third/fourth-down grade (92.7) over the last week, converting six first downs on 8-of-11 money-down throws—a stabilizer that keeps drives alive and stacks attempts. Since landing in Cincinnati, he’s posted QB15 and QB6 weeks, evidence the baseline travels even without outlier volume. The matchup is permissive. The Jets have allowed the 12th-highest yards per attempt, the eighth-most passing touchdowns, and the fourth-highest opponent passer rating, with only the 10th-lowest pressure rate to disrupt timing. That profile invites Cincinnati’s structure: condensed boxes, perimeter isolation, and slot seams that stress Cover-3 and rotate-late quarters.

Game script tilts green. New York is 0–7 and traveling, with an offense that rarely flips the field; short fields plus a pass-centric tilt when leading keep Flacco comfortably in the high-20s to low-30s attempts. Personnel matters, too. Sauce Gardner opened the week in concussion protocol and is out, outside windows widen for Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins, forcing the Jets to pick between bracket help and middle-field integrity. Flacco’s rhythm game pairs underneath precision with layered crossers and seams, and his willingness to hit checkdowns on time forces linebackers to declare—opening those intermediate daggers later.

Expect crisp red-zone sequencing over scramble-driven chaos. The Jets’ pressure rates won’t consistently move him off landmarks, and Cincinnati’s play-action and bunch releases should manufacture two or three explosives. Projection: 245–275 yards, two TDs, a pick, with a sturdy top-12 outcome if one layered shot lands and the Jets’ offense stays stuck in neutral. Ride the veteran while the volume and situational mastery hold.

Sit ‘Em

Marcus Mariota, Washington Commanders (at Kansas City Chiefs)

Mariota’s success is built on timing and legs, but Arrowhead punishes both. He’s carrying 6.3 YPA, three TDs, four INTs, and a -0.08 EPA/dropback, with a 2.82s time to throw that drifts into the teeth of rush plans. Under pressure, his completion rate dips to 46% with a pressure-to-sack rate near 25%, and his ADOT 7.1 hasn’t forced safeties to retreat. Kansas City compresses windows and caps quarterback ceilings: ~14–15 QB fantasy points allowed per game, 36–38% team pressure rate, top-five pass-rush win rate, and opponents stuck at 6.2 YPA with a 43% red-zone TD rate. Steve Spagnuolo’s answers are layered—creeper pressures, simulated overloads, and late-rotation quarters that turn first reads into hitch-and-hold traps. That’s where Mariota’s turnover-worthy throws spike.

Game environment won’t bail him out. Chiefs at home tilt snap volume toward them, and Washington’s likely response—run rate 46–48% when within one score—shrinks Mariota’s attempts into the mid-20s unless they fall behind early. Scrambles add some floor (8–10% scramble rate; 18–28 rushing yards most weeks), but Kansas City’s edges chase with discipline and their second-level fits wipe out cheap yak. Without consistent explosives or plus red-zone efficiency, you’re left needing outlier rushing production to clear a QB1/2 line. The safer read is modest efficiency, stalled third downs, and a ceiling governed by field goals, not touchdowns.

Jaxson Dart, New York Giants (at Philadelphia Eagles)

The kid’s courage and upside is spectacularly real; the matchup is quite cruel. Dart enters with 6.5 YPA, eight TDs, nine INTs, a -0.07 EPA/play, and a 9–10% sack rate driven by elongated plays (2.90s TTT) and chase-down drift. His deep completion sits sub-30% and the accuracy ebbs when moved—48% under pressure with a spike in off-platform misses. That’s the exact lever Philadelphia pulls. The Eagles roll out a top-eight pressure rate (38%), top-six pass-rush win rate, and force opponents to 6.1 YPA with a stingy red-zone TD clip around 50%. Their coverage diet is zone-forward with late rotation; they squeeze crossers, rally to glance, and build a roof that makes you stack twelve-play drives.

The trenches tilt ugly. New York’s pass protection has lived near the bottom-five in win rate, and Dart’s pressure-to-sack conversion around 22–24% hands away drives. Third down sharpens the pain: the Eagles hold opponents near 35% conversions, while Dart’s third-down split drags to 5.6 YPA with a lower first-read hit rate. Blitz answers? Philadelphia doesn’t need to overextend; four wins while seven cover, and that forces Dart into late throws against closing windows. If the Giants trail, expect predictable dagger and deep-over answers that the Eagles sit on, funneling checkdowns and inviting fourth-and-long punts. The floor is fragile, and the ceiling requires multiple broken-play chunkers against a rush that finishes.

Dan Johnson has been an editor, writer, and analyst for DraftKings and DraftKings Network since 2024. He’s previously held editorial posts at The Paris Review, Macmillan Publishers, Bedford/St. Martin’s Press, ASSIGNMENT Magazine, and FantasySixPack. You can find his various editorial work & writing (sports-related and non-) at all of the above.
Disclaimer

I am a promoter at DraftKings and am also an avid fan and user (my username is thegreatdansby9) and may sometimes play on my personal account in the games that I offer advice on. Although I have expressed my personal view on the games and strategies above, they do not necessarily reflect the view(s) of DraftKings and do not constitute a representation that any particular strategy will guarantee success. All customers should use their own skills and judgment in building lineups. I may also deploy different players and strategies than what I recommend above. I am not an employee of DraftKings and do not have access to any non-public information.