DKNetwork Logo DKNetwork Logo
Wake Forest Demon Deacons vs. Navy Midshipmen prediction, pick for NIT Tournament on Wednesday 3/18/26

Wake Forest Demon Deacons vs. Navy Midshipmen prediction, pick for NIT Tournament on Wednesday 3/18/26

Published:

By: Dan Johnson

Wake enters 17-16 after an ACC tournament win over Virginia Tech and a loss to Clemson. Navy arrives 26-7 after a Patriot League title run that ended in a one-point semifinal loss to Boston University. One team is trying to remind everyone it still owns high-major talent. The other is trying to prove that structure, age, and defensive integrity still travel in March. Below is my preview, prediction, and pick for tonight’s First Four college basketball game between the Wake Forest Demon Deacons and the Navy Midshipmen.

Here’s how I’ll play it. I’ll be pumping out these predictions for individual games all season, with plenty of coverage here on DraftKings Network. Follow my handle @dansby_edits for more betting plays.

Wake Forest vs. Navy prediction, preview

Over the last three games, Navy is scoring 77.0 points per game and allowing 70.3, while Wake is scoring 79.0 and allowing 77.7. That gap matters because it tells you Navy’s defense is still arriving on time, while Wake’s recent form has been far leakier possession to possession. Navy is also playing cleaner basketball right now, averaging 18.7 assists with only 9.0 turnovers over that stretch, compared with Wake’s 13.7 assists and a much thinner 1.242 assist-turnover ratio. So even if Wake still owns the flashier offensive ceiling, the recent math says Navy is the team entering this game with the steadier structure. That shows up in the shape of the possessions too. Navy’s current profile is still built to survive the kinds of stretches that usually break an underdog—finish possessions, keep the ball moving, and avoid giving away cheap points. Wake’s clearest path to creating margin still runs through shot-volume variance, especially from deep, but if that jumper weather is merely normal instead of hot, the recent-form gap makes this game feel much tighter than the spread suggests.

Wake still has the best scorer on the floor in Juke Harris, and that is the cleanest argument for the favorite’s higher ceiling. But Navy’s best players look more stable for this specific script. Austin Benigni remains the kind of guard you trust in an early-possession game because he can settle tempo, organize half-court offense, and protect the ball when things get tense. Aidan Kehoe gives Navy the more reliable interior pressure point, and his recent form only strengthens that case. In the Boston University loss, he still went for 26 points and 12 rebounds, which is exactly the kind of performance that travels into a game like this. That is the real difference in how these stars function. Wake’s top-end talent can bend the game faster, but Navy’s top two have been giving the Midshipmen steadier possession quality and cleaner two-way dependability, which matters more when the bet is on a dog staying attached for 20 minutes.

Wake’s ACC tournament run had noise all over it. The Deacons needed overtime to get past Virginia Tech, then got drilled early by Clemson, falling behind 41-23 at halftime before losing 71-62, with Clemson also winning the bench scoring battle 34-20. That is not the profile of a team coming in with clean control. Navy’s runway looks much sturdier. Before the one-point Boston University loss, the Midshipmen had won 14 straight, and even that defeat looked more like a sharp stumble than a structural crack. The ball security has been better, the assist flow has been better, and the overall game shape has been calmer. This current version of Navy is arriving here playing connected, veteran basketball, and that recent-form edge is a big reason the first-half dog has real life.

Navy vs. Wake Forest pick, best bet

Wake has not started like a reliable first-half favorite. The Deacons average 36.2 first-half points, but they allow 37.6. Navy averages only 34.6 before halftime, yet allows just 30.7, one of the stronger first-half defensive marks in the country. The recent split makes that edge even louder. Navy’s last-three first-half scoring is up to 39.3 points, while Wake’s last-three first-half defense is still allowing 37.3. There is also a style conflict here that favors the dog early. Wake’s offense is heavily three-point driven, with 48.8% of its field-goal attempts coming from deep, but Navy’s defense is built to erase exactly that path, allowing only 30.1% from beyond the arc for the season. So he real question is whether Wake can force early control against a team that rebounds, avoids fouls, and spends the opening 20 minutes making every possession feel a little heavier than it should.

That is why the bet is Navy +5.5 in the first half. I am not laying the full-game number against a defense this sound, and I do not need Navy to be the better team for 40 minutes. I just need the Midshipmen to keep Wake from finding immediate altitude. The statistical case supports that cleanly: better first-half defense, steadier recent ball security, a real interior anchor in Kehoe, and a lead guard in Benigni who can keep the opening stretch from getting loose. The way it loses is obvious enough. Wake catches quick jumper weather at home, Harris looks like the best athlete in the building, and the ACC talent gap flashes before Navy settles in. But the sharper shape is still the early dog, because it attacks Wake’s weakest segment and avoids the second-half talent squeeze that makes the full-game spread trickier.

Navy +5.5 1H is the look. Final score prediction: Wake Forest 74, Navy 70.

Best bet: Navy 1H +5.5 (-105) vs. Wake Forest

Tail it with me in the DKN Betting Group here!

I’ve included this play in a parlay I’ve posted here in The CBB Board, the betting group where you can find DKN Analyst plays each and every day. It’s free. You just join and tail bets directly from your DraftKings app and get byte-sized analysis (< 1000 characters!) from myself and my colleagues. I encourage you to check it out.

I am a promoter at DraftKings and am also an avid fan and user (my username is thegreatdansby9) and may sometimes play on my personal account in the games that I offer advice on. Although I have expressed my personal view on the games and strategies above, they do not necessarily reflect the view(s) of DraftKings and do not constitute a representation that any particular strategy will guarantee success. All customers should use their own skills and judgment in building lineups. I may also deploy different players and strategies than what I recommend above. I am not an employee of DraftKings and do not have access to any non-public information.