DKNetwork Logo DKNetwork Logo
Saint Bonaventure Bonnies vs. Rhode Island Rams prediction, pick for NCAAM on Thursday 2/25/26

Saint Bonaventure Bonnies vs. Rhode Island Rams prediction, pick for NCAAM on Thursday 2/25/26

Published:

By: Dan Johnson

Rhode Island walks into Olean with the steadier late-February pulse, even if Saint Bonaventure owns the building. The Rams are 15-12 overall and 6-8 in the A-10, still sitting above the Bonnies in the league race, and their recent games keep tightening into the kind of one- and two-possession fights that make a short number feel live. Saint Bonaventure is 14-13 and 3-11 in conference play, carrying the more dangerous shot-making profile but also a three-game skid that has exposed too much defensive slippage. Rhode Island has already shown it can win ugly and win loud enough when the game gets physical, with an overtime road win at Dayton and an 81-76 scalp of then-No. 18 Saint Louis. Below is my preview, prediction, and pick for tonight’s college basketball game between the Saint Bonaventure Bonnies and the Rhode Island Rams.

Here’s how I’ll play it. I’ll be pumping out these predictions for individual games all season, with plenty of coverage here on DraftKings Network. Follow my handle @dansby_edits for more betting plays.

Saint Bonaventure vs. URI prediction, preview

Saint Bonaventure has the home floor, but Rhode Island has the steadier late-February pulse. The Rams come in 15-12 and 6-8 in the A-10, the Bonnies 14-13 and 3-11, and the recent shape matters more than the season-long form here. Rhode Island’s last 10 games have lived in a 70.5 scored and 72.6 allowed band, and its last five in a 69.0 and 71.4 band, which is another way of saying the Rams keep dragging games back toward one or two possessions. Saint Bonaventure’s last 10 sit at 75.2 scored and 78.8 allowed, with the last five at 74.4 and 77.4, so the Bonnies are still capable of putting points on the board, but they keep giving the game back. Rhode Island’s profile also comes with two real late-season markers: an overtime road win at Dayton and an 81-76 home upset of then-No. 18 Saint Louis. Saint Bonaventure’s recent game log is louder for the wrong reasons, with a three-game skid that includes 78 allowed to Duquesne, 71 at home to Saint Joseph’s, and 99 at Richmond.

Rhode Island’s best pieces are built for a messy game. The Rams aren’t winning beauty contests. Tyler Cochran is the stabilizer and the chaos button at once: 14.5 points, 5.5 rebounds, 72 assists, and 73 steals on the year, with recent spikes of 34 against Richmond, 25 against Fordham, and 24 at George Washington. Jonah Hinton gives the Rams their real spacing valve with 13.9 a night and 71 made threes, and when he catches rhythm, as he did with 29 against Saint Louis, the whole offense stops feeling so cramped. Jahmere Tripp is the burst scorer in the middle of it, averaging 12.5 while shooting 47.5% from the floor and 41.3% from deep, and Keeyan Itejere is the interior glue at 67.5% from the field with 5.8 rebounds and 39 blocks.

Saint Bonaventure’s top line is cleaner and more explosive. Darryl Simmons II is the best pure shot-maker in the game at 16.6 per night on 42.6% from three and 88.1% at the stripe, Frank Mitchell brings 16.0 points and 9.9 rebounds on 54.8% shooting, Cayden Charles adds 12.7 and 6.4, and Dasonte Bowen runs the offense with 127 assists. The difference is not talent. It is function. Saint Bonaventure’s headliners are built to win a scoring contest. Rhode Island’s core is built to keep the game from opening up in the first place.

URI vs. Saint Bonaventure pick, best bet

The Bonnies shoot it better, move it better, and rebound better. They are at 47.1% from the floor, 37.3% from three, 34.8 rebounds, and 16.0 assists per game, all clearly cleaner than Rhode Island’s 44.3%, 31.1%, 32.8, and 11.3. But the recent game logs make that edge feel much less trustworthy than it looks on the stat page. Saint Bonaventure’s offense has not been the problem; its inability to turn that offense into control has. The Bonnies have gone 3-7 over their last 10 and 1-4 over their last five, and the recent losses have been unsettling: 97-62 against Saint Louis, 78-73 against Duquesne, 71-65 against Saint Joseph’s, and 99-94 at Richmond. Rhode Island has its own ugliness, including the 59-46 dud at La Salle, but its recent losses are still living in tighter bands: 75-70 at George Washington, 70-66 in overtime against Fordham, 76-61 at Duquesne, and that La Salle clunker. One team’s recent shape says the offense must bail out leaks. The other says the offense can wobble and the game still usually stays attached. That is a meaningful difference when the number is this short.

That is why the matchup mechanics tilt toward Rhode Island against the spread even if Saint Bonaventure may still be the likelier straight-up winner. Rhode Island is not built to out-glamour anybody, but it is built to create enough disorder to keep the margin compressed. The Rams force 14.4 turnovers per game, own a +1.9 turnover margin, average 8.7 steals, and turn those extra possessions into 16.7 points off turnovers. Saint Bonaventure is much prettier in the half court, but the Bonnies also allow 74.9 points per game on 46.1% opponent shooting and 8.3 opponent threes per night, so clean possessions keep turning into playable offense for the other side. Rhode Island’s own offense is flawed, but the Rams defend to a 68.4 points-allowed mark and hold opponents to 43.5% from the floor. That is the spread story in one sentence: Saint Bonaventure has the cleaner jumper, Rhode Island has the sturdier game-shape tools.

Spotwise, Rhode Island looks like a team that has learned how to live in ugly games. The Rams have already shown they can beat a ranked Saint Louis team when the game gets physical and late, and even when the offense sputters, they still tend to pull the score back into a manageable range. Saint Bonaventure feels more volatile. The Bonnies still have enough shot-making to look dangerous for long stretches, especially at home, but the last few weeks read like a team that keeps giving away the comfort of its own scoring. That is what the Richmond game said. That is what the Saint Joseph’s game said. That is what the Duquesne loss said. In a late-season A-10 game with a small number, the team that has been more comfortable living in a fistfight is usually the safer side than the team still trying to win with polish while the floor shifts under it.

The market is still pricing Saint Bonaventure as the short favorite, with books showing the Bonnies in roughly the -2.5 to -3.5 range and the total in the mid-140s, while consensus is only modestly tilted toward the home side rather than overwhelming. That is the right kind of number to take Rhode Island, not because of a label, but because the Rams have the more believable path to land inside it. Dunkel’s trend split sharpens that point: Saint Bonaventure is 3-11 ATS when favored by 2.5 or more, while Rhode Island is 6-4 ATS as an underdog of 2.5 or more.

Best bet: Rhode Island +2.5, playable no further than where it is. The way it dies is Rhode Island’s offense freezing again, because the Rams are still only a 31.1% three-point shooting team on the season and just put up 46 at La Salle, but the stronger recent pattern still points to a tight, physical game that stays inside one possession more often than Saint Bonaventure has shown it can cleanly control.

Prediction: Saint Bonaventure 73, Rhode Island 71.

Best bet: URI +2.5 (+100) at Saint Bonaventure

Tail it with me in the DKN Betting Group here!

Dan Johnson has been an editor, writer, and analyst for DraftKings and DraftKings Network since 2024. He’s previously held editorial posts at The Paris Review, Macmillan Publishers, Bedford/St. Martin’s Press, ASSIGNMENT Magazine, and FantasySixPack. You can find his various editorial work & writing (sports-related and non-) at all of the above.
Disclaimer

I am a promoter at DraftKings and am also an avid fan and user (my username is thegreatdansby9) and may sometimes play on my personal account in the games that I offer advice on. Although I have expressed my personal view on the games and strategies above, they do not necessarily reflect the view(s) of DraftKings and do not constitute a representation that any particular strategy will guarantee success. All customers should use their own skills and judgment in building lineups. I may also deploy different players and strategies than what I recommend above. I am not an employee of DraftKings and do not have access to any non-public information.